Skip to main content

Taking a Verse out of Context

At times we haphazardly use the Bible. We try to prove a point or one of our long-held beliefs, and we yank a verse out of thin air to confirm what we mean. This practice is called "Taking a verse out of Context." One classic example of this practice follows. The Bible teaches that smoking is OK. If Rebecca did it, we could do it. How do we know that Rebecca smoked? Look up Genesis 24:64. There you will find these words - And Rebekah lifted up her eyes, and when she saw Isaac, she lighted off the camel.

Of course, this is a ridiculous illustration. However, it is no more silly than many so-called theological "proof text" to absurd arguments these days. 


When studying the Bible, we must remember the age-old adage that says context is king. If we don't know the context of a single verse, we will err in its interpretation. Theologian Dr. D. A. Carson attributed his father, saying, "A text without a context is a pretext for a proof text.


I bring up this subject because I came to a fascinating verse in Jeremiah 23:38. I was reading in the New International Version, where the text goes like this, Although you claim, 'This is a message from the Lord,' this is what the Lord says: You used the words, 'This is a message from the Lord,' even though I told you that you must not claim, 'This is a message from the Lord.


A little confused, I went to a commentary and got the following explanation. - Seeing, notwithstanding all prohibitions of it, and directions to the contrary, they still persisted to call prophecy by this name, and that in a jocose and bantering way, and asked for it, and what it was, in a scoffing manner: 


Therefore thus saith the Lord, because you say this word, the burden of the Lord; will continue to use it, though so displeasing to me: and I have sent unto you, saying, ye shall not say, the burden of the Lord; and therefore could not plead ignorance of his will, or excuse themselves, by saying they would have avoided it, had they known it was disagreeable to him: this was an aggravation of their impiety, that they should obstinately persist in it after he had remonstrated against it by his messages to them.


Well, now, there you have it. Clear as mud. 


Written "explanations" like the above were for different generations. We don't use words like "notwithstanding," "jocose," and "remonstrated" too often these days. And, since this commentary entry wasn't too helpful, what are we to make of this seemingly strange verse? 


It is here that context will help us. Here is my explanation of chapter 23.

A chapter that begins with "WOE!" warns that severe news is ahead. And indeed it was.


The shepherds, read religious leaders, did the opposite of what shepherds were to do. They were destroying, scattering, and ruining God's flock. God was about to do to them what they had done to His sheep. God would bring the scattered back to the fold and place His leader, the righteous Branch, His king from the line of David (Jesus), over them. This new king would rule wisely and take care of the sheep, and both Judah and Israel would be under his care. His name would be The Lord Our Righteous Savior.


This new turn of events would cause the world to relate Israel's salvation, not to the freedom from Egyptian slavery, but liberation from Babylonian captivity. But, unfortunately, the so-called prophets, these false mouthpieces from God, spewed their own message and afterward proclaimed it as from God. If these false prophets had spoken what God told them, the people would have turned from their evil ways (22).


So, let's look again at our original verse. Although you claim, 'This is a message from the Lord,' this is what the Lord says: You used the words, 'This is a message from the Lord,' even though I told you that you must not claim, 'This is a message from the Lord.


Now we understand what is going on. These false religious leaders claimed that their message was from God when it wasn't. They were in essence taking words out of context and saying that they were from God. Thus they would be punished, and God would send the people they lead into exile for the next seventy years. Therefore most would die in captivity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Daughter and dog...

About six months ago we discovered that Ann was pregnant and were very excited for she and Jackson. We will have babies on this side and that of the Atlantic. We weren't prepared for that news and we we were even less prepared for the news that our little dog is pregnant. To date we have spent more on the dog than on Annie (don't tell her... Ann that is). Ann has yet to discover whether her baby is a boy or girl. Both ultrasound images were inconclusive. Though I did some further investigation of my own and was startled with what I found. to me it looks as if the baby is definitely a boy and has some resemblance from both sides of the family. Take a look for yourself and let me know what you think.

Urgent Prayer (part 2)

Does God ever give you a gut punch? He did that just a few days ago when I watched a missionary story from the other side of the world. It was short but poignant, and it punched me in the belly button and brought a few tears too. One thing that shook me was the final statement that the missionary made. He was questioning himself and said, I wonder if what I have done will make a difference. This question comes to a missionary's mind now and again as they ponder how vast God's world is and how tiny one’s work is. As I thought, and identified, with his sentiment, the Lord brought a verse to mind that I had used recently in a youth talk. It was this one in John 12:24, “ Very truly, I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds. ” When, in Matthew, the sower sowed his seed, it was the Word of God. Here in John, Jesus indicates that the seed is the life of the servant. Jesus talked of his comi...

Living Up to Expectations

walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called (Ephesians 4.1) I’m sorry but I cannot imagine being primped to be a duke, prince or king! I have always thought of Prince Charles as a big wuss in waiting. His whole life has been spent preparing to be “the next king of England.” This poor guy has gone above and beyond the call of duty in being groomed for a position that Elizabeth II, his mom, doesn’t seem to want to give up. Elizabeth’s mother, the Honourable Elizabeth Angela Marguerite Bowes-Lyon, lived for 101 years for Pete’s sake! Does Charley have a chance? Doubt it. Why this talk about princely preening? Well my friend it is because we as God’s children are in a similar process. In Ephesians 4.1 Paul goes into some interesting details. He tells us the following. I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, The word vocation trips us up. I went through my career at GM working my best so that I would plea...